How to Recognize a Globalist Agenda When it Slaps You in the Face

The nomination and awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama has been met around the world with expressions of disbelief, confusion and incredulity. Rightly so. After all, how can the figurehead (I hesitate to say leader) of the world's biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons, world's largest and most complex military, world's most beliggerent country which not only overtly invades sovereign nations on flimsy pretexts, but covertly supports bloody coups and insurgencies elsewhere, be even mentioned in the same sentence as the word 'peace'?

The Nobel Peace Prize, as most of you know, originated from the last will and testament of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish inventor of dynamite. Although dynamite was not used on battlefields during his lifetime, he knew that it would be, and was so appalled by this that in mitigation he called for the establishment of a prize that should go to "the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses."

Despite the fact that Obama was nominated for this prize less than two weeks into his term, there is one glaring point that should have disqualified him immediately. He has increased the amount of troops in Afghanistan, and has authorised the use of drones to fire rockets into villages in nuclear armed Pakistan, killing people who had no idea of what is even going on. This creep into Pakistan is a spreading of the fiery part of America's global war on terror (WW3). There goes "reduction of standing armies" and "fraternity between nations".

To be fair, Obama himself said that he did not think he had done enough to deserve the award, or to be in the company of the transformative figures who had won it before him, though he did not have the conscience to decline the prize, as Le Duc Tho did in 1973. His Cairo address marked a shift in America's attitude to the Arab world, at least rhetorically. The same can be said of the disapproving murmurings about Israel's Apartheid style treatment of Palestinians and Nazi Liebensraum style expansionism. Talk. And talk is cheap. Iraq is still hell, Guantanamo is still open, the atmosphere is still the USA's gaseous garbage dump, poor people in America are still denied healthcare. More proof that campaign promises are the poorest kind of promise. Symbols say more than talk. Take a look at the presidential seal of the United States. The star of David made up of thirteen stars hovers above an eagle grasping a thirteen leaved olive branch in one claw and thirteen arrows in the other. The Cairo address may have appeased some Arabs and Muslims, but most of them know which star this bird is following and that its not going to let go of those arrows any time soon.

So who decided to award this warlord the world's heretofore most respected peace prize? Nominations are only accepted from previous prize winners, a very small section of the world's intellectual elite, and the world's political elite. The committee is comprised of five people, all of them members of the Norwegian parliament. The chairperson is Thorbjørn Jagland, also secretary general of the Council of Europe. Although not a member of the EU, Norway is a member of the European Economic Area and complies with many EU policies and stipulations for this reason.

This is just a rough sketch of the visible power structure of who decides where the prize goes, but take a step back , and try to describe this whole idea of war-spreader-gets-peace-maker-prize in one word...

... That's right. Orwellian. And Orwell's famous maxim from 1984 immediately springs to mind:

"WAR IS PEACE. FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH"

And you are watching Big Brother. Do we need a bigger wake up call than this to show us that there is a globalist agenda at work here, conflating archetypes and attempting to subvert our very ideas of what peace, freedom and strength mean? That the war of terror is a war on Terra, the very consciousness of our planet and the basis of our remaining sense of human unity? That these would-be world controllers not only control our parliaments, media, industry and 'healthcare', but also seek to control our minds?

I think they've dropped the ball on this one though. Awarding Obama the Nobel Prize for Peace is a step too far. They've jumped the gun. Too many people are standing up and saying "WHAT!?" and the hits on David Icke, Michael Tsarion, Drunvalo Melchizedek and Credo Mutwa's websites just keep soaring.

Are you buying the lie?